<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leadership insights from Ford&#8217;s CEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketing-has-changed.com/leadership-insights-from-fords-ceo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketing-has-changed.com/leadership-insights-from-fords-ceo/</link>
	<description>by John Ellett</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:32:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen Luna</title>
		<link>http://marketing-has-changed.com/leadership-insights-from-fords-ceo/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen Luna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketing-has-changed.com/?p=598#comment-90</guid>
		<description>I liked this article and I really liked the questions you posed building off Alan&#039;s comments.  

In my mind the toughest question to answer is the first one: &quot;How do we connect what we do to the outside world?&quot;

I am in the ad agency world so this is challenging considering the dynamic/ever-changing environment of the advertising industry.  New technologies, the obsolescence of advertising mediums (as a direct result of emerging technologies) and new competitors popping up every day, make answering this question difficult.  It seems like &quot;what we do&quot; changes so often that it needs constant redefining.  

In many cases marketers want agencies to &quot;put a stake in the ground&quot; in terms of their capabilities and what their core discipline/strength is but agencies feel that by doing this they are limiting themselves to that one discipline and shutting the door to other potential clients.  Personally I prefer when agencies claim one core strength versus trying to be everything to everyone.  Classic example of &quot;jack of all trades, master of none&quot;. 

I digress a bit from the original question, however I do find it challenging to define &quot;what we do&quot; in such an ever-changing environment that the advertising industry finds itself in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked this article and I really liked the questions you posed building off Alan&#8217;s comments.  </p>
<p>In my mind the toughest question to answer is the first one: &#8220;How do we connect what we do to the outside world?&#8221;</p>
<p>I am in the ad agency world so this is challenging considering the dynamic/ever-changing environment of the advertising industry.  New technologies, the obsolescence of advertising mediums (as a direct result of emerging technologies) and new competitors popping up every day, make answering this question difficult.  It seems like &#8220;what we do&#8221; changes so often that it needs constant redefining.  </p>
<p>In many cases marketers want agencies to &#8220;put a stake in the ground&#8221; in terms of their capabilities and what their core discipline/strength is but agencies feel that by doing this they are limiting themselves to that one discipline and shutting the door to other potential clients.  Personally I prefer when agencies claim one core strength versus trying to be everything to everyone.  Classic example of &#8220;jack of all trades, master of none&#8221;. </p>
<p>I digress a bit from the original question, however I do find it challenging to define &#8220;what we do&#8221; in such an ever-changing environment that the advertising industry finds itself in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
